'58 Edsel's 361 (303 HP) Factory Claim Vs. Real Dyno Results

Discussion of MEL engine related topics only.

'58 Edsel's 361 (303 HP) Factory Claim Vs. Real Dyno Results

Postby Shelby#18 on Mon 26. Jul 2010, 21:39

A big thanks to Dane LaFortune (My restorer) for finding this, and scanning for us. I have the next issue on order for Chapter 2, and will post when received.
HotRod58_Cover.jpg

HotRod58_01.jpg

HotRod58_02.jpg

HotRod58_03.jpg

HotRod58_04.jpg

HotRod58_05.jpg

HotRod58_06.jpg
User avatar
Shelby#18
Senior Airman
Senior Airman
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Fri 17. Apr 2009, 21:15

Re: 1958 MEL 361 Horsepower article

Postby Shelby#18 on Thu 29. Jul 2010, 22:53

As promised the conclusion of the article.
Full House for 58 Fords High .jpg

Full House for 58 Fords High 1.jpg

Full House for 58 Fords High 2.jpg

Full House for 58 Fords High  3.jpg

Full House for 58 Fords High 4.jpg

Full House for 58 Fords High  5.jpg
User avatar
Shelby#18
Senior Airman
Senior Airman
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Fri 17. Apr 2009, 21:15

Re: 1958 MEL 361 Horsepower article

Postby KULTULZ on Mon 2. Aug 2010, 09:05

You realize the 361 (1958-1959) was an EDSEL specific (E-400) FE? It was a 390 bore size with a 352 stroke (same as later 360 FE light truck engine.

Interesting article though.
User avatar
KULTULZ
Senior Airman
Senior Airman
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed 12. May 2010, 17:35

Re: 1958 MEL 361 Horsepower article

Postby Theo on Mon 2. Aug 2010, 10:30

That's right. I didn't realize it too because I had no time yet to take a look at it. Viewing the pics the cylinder head chambers are typical FE chambers. It looks like a very interesting article though. I'd love to read it when time allows within the next few days. Rick, I'd vote for renaming the topic and keeping it in the MEL forum though.
Best regards
Theo
Admin
User avatar
Theo
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 21. Dec 2008, 22:10
Location: Berlin / Potsdam in Germany

Re: 1958 361 Horsepower. Edsels Love Affair with the FE engi

Postby Shelby#18 on Mon 2. Aug 2010, 17:29

The reason for the post was so that others could see the Hp results not being what was stated from the factory literature. (And I'm fine with the title change.)
User avatar
Shelby#18
Senior Airman
Senior Airman
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Fri 17. Apr 2009, 21:15

Re: 1958 Edsel's 361 HP Factory Literature Vs. Real Dyno Re

Postby Theo on Mon 2. Aug 2010, 17:50

Rick, I changed the topic title to "1958 Edsel's 361 HP Factory Literature Vs. Real Dyno Resuls" if you don't mind. Just change it if you feel you have s.th. more adequate to the topic. I'm only suggesting.
Best regards
Theo
Admin
User avatar
Theo
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 21. Dec 2008, 22:10
Location: Berlin / Potsdam in Germany

Re: '58 Edsel's 361 (303 HP) Factory Claim Vs. Real Dyno Res

Postby Theo on Tue 3. Aug 2010, 00:59

That's much better. Thanx for correcting.
Best regards
Theo
Admin
User avatar
Theo
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 21. Dec 2008, 22:10
Location: Berlin / Potsdam in Germany

Re: '58 Edsel's 361 (303 HP) Factory Claim Vs. Real Dyno Res

Postby KULTULZ on Tue 3. Aug 2010, 05:53

This now gets one wondering as to whether the first release 58 352 (solid lifters-machined combustion chambers) did meet factory HP ratings and this engine (361) and the later modified 352 (hydraulic lifters) were actually detuned to meet the racing ban of the period and the factory did not change the claimed HP ratings.
User avatar
KULTULZ
Senior Airman
Senior Airman
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed 12. May 2010, 17:35


Return to MEL Engine General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron