CHRIS CRAFT COMMANDER FORUM ® .......A photo-intensive technical reference file and ongoing newsletter regarding the original fiberglass Chris Craft Commander. Our mission at this not-for-profit non-commercial web site is to "have fun and share information" for your individual personal use. Our main reference feature is the ever expanding MASTER INDEX Files which contain exhaustive photo and technical information on the Chris Craft Commander line (like these 38' Commander brochure scans) , (an awesome collection of Chris Craft 427 tuning and specification information), and a few words about how to use the information in the forum, etc. Be sure to look at the information about the 2009 Chris Craft Commander Rendezvous, second year in a row on Lake Erie!! If you're a Commander fan, this will be an event you won't want to miss.

We extend to you a cordial "WELCOME ABOARD !"

This forum is registered as chriscraftcommander.com

 Return to index  

Agreed!

February 7 2008 at 5:06 PM
Bill  (Login billinstuart)


Response to Small block ~v~ big block (and....did you know a marine 427 has more than 300-hp? )

I agree "horsepower" is meaningless in marine engine comparison. Horsepower is simply :

Torque x RPM/5252.

No big mystery. The dyno measures torque..horsepower is computed. Horsepower at 5000 rpms is meaningless when you cruise at part throttle at 3000 rpms. 438 @ 2900 rpms is respectable, but well within the range of a properly built 383 Chebby or 454. The 383 has a long stroke, comparable to the 427..long stroke, long rod (in the engine dammit) produces midrange torque.

The small block is a few hundred pounds lighter than a big block Chevy (BBC), and ANYTHING is lighter than a 427 Ford with cast iron accessories.

The BBC is a little torquier because it has a longer stroke and rod, and even a puny BBC should be capable of over 400 ft.lbs. @ 3000 rpms. This is at full throttle, btw.

Diesels have high AVAILABLE torque because they run at higher loads than gas engines. They also cruise at rpms close to "wide open". I wouldn't be surprised if diesels ran at 80% of capacity, and gas engines at 50% of capacity. Diesels are more "fuel efficient" for 2 reasons..1) There is more energy available in diesel fuel than gasoline, gallon for gallon 2) they are more efficient because of the higher compression. That's it. No magic to it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

Contact the Chris Craft Commander Forum
chriscraftcommander@hotmail.com

©2005, ©2006, ©2007, ©2008, Chris-Craft Commander Forum, Inc., ®, chriscraftcommander.com. Information and intellectual property on this not-for-profit non-commercial site may be copied for individual personal use, but any other reproduction or use requires written approval. Any entity who mines this site for names, material, or their other commercial/financial benefit in any way is subject to copyright and intellectual property law; the integrity of this site will be aggressively protected. The material here is for indivudual personal use and is not to be sold. Chris Craft is a registered trademark of Chris-Craft. Neither Chris-Craft nor any subsidiaries of Chris-Craft shall bear any responsibility for the chriscraftcommander.com content, comments, or advertising. Chris Craft Commander Forum, Inc., is independent from Chris Craft (and the Chris Craft Commander Club) and is not affiliated with, sponsored or supported by those organizations in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended, or implied. Don't click on the following link unless you want spam, it's a search engine link. AddMe.com, Search Engine Submission and SEO google37b5db87ae53b031.html