--


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Why not MEL instead of FE for FT purposes?

April 21 2005 at 7:14 AM
No score for this post
  (Login gary477)
from IP address 216.47.188.33

-
Why did Ford choose the FE over the MEL for medium truck and industrial engines? Compared to the FE, the MEL has more of everything you want in such an engine - more water jacketing, thicker crank, more bearing area. They would have " plankheads " in their medium and heavy trucks if they used the MEL. Consider the history of using Lincoln engines in Ford trucks - the 337 E series flathead and the Lincoln Y-block. Maybe they didnt want to call the engine series MELT.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

(Login KULTULZ)
MEL Forum Moderator
69.140.54.63

Simple Reason Why...

No score for this post
April 24 2005, 3:31 PM 

When the MEL was released FORD was using the FORD Y-BLOCK (272HD/292HD) and the LINCOLN Y-BLOCK (302/332) for medium truck duty. When these designs needed to be upgraded, the MEL had already fallen behind in design progressions. It was easier and cheaper for FORD to go to the FE as a replacement. It (FE) just needed a few changes to power medium truck.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Why not MEL instead of FE for FT purposes?
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on CarsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright � 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Neue Seite 5
     
  The MEL Engine  Knowledge Base        The MEL Photo Section       Orig. FE Big Block Forum        FE Big Block Forum     Other Cool Links  

go back to page 1 of   The (MEL) 383, 410, 430, 462 cid Engine Forum