--

 Return to Index  

Adjustable-Non Adjustable Valvetrain

July 5 2007 at 6:05 AM
No score for this post
  (Login KULTULZ)
MEL Forum Moderator
from IP address 69.140.42.35


Response to Kultulz, FE adjustable rockers are not a solid lifter only thing

 
Morning Hawkrod-

Hawkrod Scolded KULTULZ By Posting-

"You wrote "Are the roller rockers adjustable (intended for solid cam FE)" and I thought you may want to know that adjustable rocker arms were used with hydraulic lifters as well and they are the same rockers as used with solid lifters. Not all FE's with hydraulic lifters had fixed rockers and ford did not "intend" for adjustable rockers to be a solid lifter only thing. For example, 428 SCJ was a hydraulic lifter engine and had adjustable rockers as did many (not all) 58 Ford 332 and 352 engines.

Hawkrod"

It seems we are always at one another...

The 428CJ/SCJ had a non-adjustable valvetrain from the factory. Maybe the initial release (Winternationals) had them, but regular production did not. The 1958 332 and 352 early production was solid, and changed to hydraulic later in the production year. The only other adjustable valvetrain (other than 390HP-406-427) were the PI 390/428 with solids. Valve adjustment on a FE (hydraulic) is performed with pushrod length, as I am sure you know.

I also understand the use of adjustable rocker arms on a hydraulic cam.

Please provide documentation if I am wrong.

As you know, the rocker shafts are different between solid and hydraulic. This is what I am trying to establish to help determine proper oil supply. It seems these tech questions always leave out the most important information needed to help.

When is that BIRD going to be running?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. rocker trivia - treinarts on Jul 5, 9:17 AM
  2.  
  3. I am sorry you took it as a scolding, It was meant as a sharing of information. - hawkrod on Jul 5, 3:44 PM
    1. Just Aggravating You Hawkrod... - KULTULZ on Jul 5, 6:42 PM
      1. Nope, I have not seen any adjustables EXCEPT... - hawkrod on Jul 5, 9:58 PM
        1. Interesting Hawkrod... - KULTULZ on Jul 10, 1:35 AM
          1. It wasn't a 330 FT - hawkrod on Jul 10, 2:14 PM
     
Find more forums on CarsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright � 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Neue Seite 5
     
  The MEL Engine  Knowledge Base        The MEL Photo Section       Orig. FE Big Block Forum        FE Big Block Forum     Other Cool Links  

go back to page 1 of   The (MEL) 383, 410, 430, 462 cid Engine Forum